Head-to-head · vehicle level

Mazda CX-50 vs. Toyota bZ

Mazda CX-50 86Toyota bZ 84on the MotiveGrid ScoreMazda CX-50 about $2,275 less over 5 years
The verdict

The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is the cheaper one to own — roughly $2,275 less over five years, mostly because it holds its value better.

The Mazda CX-50 is the stronger all-round pick here — cheaper to own with little given up in return.

Last updated July 2026 · National-average estimates

Mazda CX-50 vs. Toyota bZ

MotiveGrid scores, key specs, and five-year cost comparison: 2026 Mazda CX-50 versus 2026 Toyota bZ.
MetricMazda CX-50Toyota bZ
MotiveGrid Score8684
Cost of Ownership9081
Powertrain6783
Driver Assistance3249
Livability6039
Safety9994
5-Year Cost to Own$42,687$44,961
Depreciation (5-yr)$11,631$21,737
Fuel / Energy (5-yr)$12,187$2,520
Insurance (5-yr)$9,535$10,945
Maintenance (5-yr)$1,790$900
Tires (5-yr)$2,150$1,750
Financing (5-yr)$4,499$5,469
Registration (5-yr)$895$1,640
Starting Price$29,900$36,350
Horsepower187 hp168 hp
MPG (combined)27 mpg
Electric range236 mi
Cargo volume31.4 cu ft27.7 cu ft
Seating55
Towing capacity2,000 lbs
DrivetrainAWDFWD
Gas
2026$29,900
2026 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium Plus front three-quarter view
MSRP
$29,900
Mo · 5yr
$711
$42,687 / 5 years
Best for long-term savings
Electric
2026$36,350
2026 Toyota bZ electric SUV in three-quarter front view
MSRP
$36,350
Mo · 5yr
$749
$44,961 / 5 years
Best for driver assistance
VS
01 · The MotiveGrid Score

Five measured pillars, weighted into one score.

Cost, Powertrain, Driver Assistance, Livability, and Safety — each scored against its class, then combined into a single MotiveGrid Score. Built by our engineering team and benchmarked against independent sources like NHTSA, IIHS, and CarEdge. How it’s calculated →

Mazda CX-50 scores higher overall.

Mazda CX-50
0
/ 100
Toyota bZ
0
/ 100
CostFive-year all-in cost to own, benchmarked against the class median.
CX-50
90
bZ
81
Winner: CX-50
$2,275 cheaper / 5 yrs
Strong projected resale value
PowertrainEnergy efficiency paired with long-term ownership confidence.
CX-50
67
bZ
83
Winner: bZ
+16 pts
Efficient (high MPG-equivalent)
Driver AssistHighway driving support, parking convenience, and hands-free automation.
CX-50
32
bZ
49
Winner: bZ
+17 pts
Strong highway driving support
LivabilityPassenger space, cargo room, and everyday maneuverability.
CX-50
60
bZ
39
Winner: CX-50
+21 pts
Easy to maneuver and park
SafetyCrash-test protection plus standard crash-avoidance features.
CX-50
99
bZ
94
Winner: CX-50
+5 pts
5-star overall NHTSA rating
IIHS Top Safety Pick+
02

Which vehicle is right for you

🏆

Mazda CX-50 is the better pick for long-term ownership — about $2,275 cheaper over 5 years with stronger fundamentals on running cost.

Toyota bZ still wins if your priority is best for driver assistance.

Daily commuter
Toyota bZ
Lowest energy cost per mile
Budget-focused
Mazda CX-50
Cheapest to own across 5 years
Family hauler
Mazda CX-50
Better safety rating with slightly more cargo room
Highway driver
Toyota bZ
Better adaptive cruise + lane keep
City driver
Toyota bZ
Easiest to park and maneuver in tight spots
03

Cost of Ownership

Monthly running costs — national baseline.
Adjust for your situation

State

Miles/yr15,000
Loan rate7%
Down payment20%

Charging mix

Mazda CX-50
Monthly · 5-Year avg
$711
$42,687 total / 5 years
Total · monthly$711/mo
Toyota bZ
Monthly · 5-Year avg
$749
$44,961 total / 5 years
Total · monthly$749/mo
💡
On fuel + maintenance alone, the pricier Toyota bZ recoups its $6,450 price premium in 3.1 years ($2,111/yr in savings). Depreciation and insurance aren’t included in this payback view.
04

Frequently asked questions

Mazda CX-50 comes out about $2,275 cheaper over 5 years on running costs (depreciation, fuel/energy, insurance, maintenance, financing). The gap shifts with your state, annual miles, and loan rate — use the "Adjust for your situation" panel above.

Where these rank

Browse all MotiveGrid rankings →

Helpful guides