Head-to-head · vehicle level

Honda HR-V vs. Mazda CX-50

Honda HR-V 78Mazda CX-50 86on the MotiveGrid ScoreHonda HR-V about $4,530 less over 5 years
The verdict

The 2026 Honda HR-V is the cheaper one to own — roughly $4,530 less over five years, mostly because it holds its value better. The Mazda CX-50 counters with more cargo room (31.4 vs 24.4 cu ft).

Go with the Honda HR-V for the better long-term value; consider the Mazda CX-50 if you prioritize more cargo space.

Last updated July 2026 · National-average estimates

Honda HR-V vs. Mazda CX-50

MotiveGrid scores, key specs, and five-year cost comparison: 2026 Honda HR-V versus 2026 Mazda CX-50.
MetricHonda HR-VMazda CX-50
MotiveGrid Score7886
Cost of Ownership9190
Powertrain6267
Driver Assistance4332
Livability5460
Safety7999
5-Year Cost to Own$38,157$42,687
Depreciation (5-yr)$8,533$11,631
Fuel / Energy (5-yr)$12,027$12,187
Insurance (5-yr)$9,135$9,535
Maintenance (5-yr)$2,150$1,790
Tires (5-yr)$1,500$2,150
Financing (5-yr)$3,987$4,499
Registration (5-yr)$825$895
Starting Price$26,500$29,900
Horsepower158 hp187 hp
MPG (combined)28 mpg27 mpg
Cargo volume24.4 cu ft31.4 cu ft
Seating55
Towing capacity2,000 lbs
DrivetrainFWDAWD
Gas
2026$26,500
2026 Honda HR-V subcompact SUV in three-quarter front view
MSRP
$26,500
Mo · 5yr
$636
$38,157 / 5 years
Best for long-term savings
Gas
2026$29,900
2026 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium Plus front three-quarter view
MSRP
$29,900
Mo · 5yr
$711
$42,687 / 5 years
Best for families
VS
01 · The MotiveGrid Score

Five measured pillars, weighted into one score.

Cost, Powertrain, Driver Assistance, Livability, and Safety — each scored against its class, then combined into a single MotiveGrid Score. Built by our engineering team and benchmarked against independent sources like NHTSA, IIHS, and CarEdge. How it’s calculated →

Mazda CX-50 scores higher overall.

Honda HR-V
0
/ 100
Mazda CX-50
0
/ 100
CostFive-year all-in cost to own, benchmarked against the class median.
HR-V
91
CX-50
90
Winner: HR-V
$4,530 cheaper / 5 yrs
Low tires cost
PowertrainEnergy efficiency paired with long-term ownership confidence.
HR-V
62
CX-50
67
Winner: CX-50
+5 pts
Driver AssistHighway driving support, parking convenience, and hands-free automation.
HR-V
43
CX-50
32
Winner: HR-V
+11 pts
Strong highway driving support
LivabilityPassenger space, cargo room, and everyday maneuverability.
HR-V
54
CX-50
60
Winner: CX-50
+6 pts
SafetyCrash-test protection plus standard crash-avoidance features.
HR-V
79
CX-50
99
Winner: CX-50
+20 pts
Full standard crash-avoidance suite
02

Which vehicle is right for you

🏆

Honda HR-V is the better pick for long-term ownership — about $4,530 cheaper over 5 years with stronger fundamentals on running cost.

Mazda CX-50 still wins if your priority is best for families.

Daily commuter
Honda HR-V
Lowest energy cost per mile
Budget-focused
Honda HR-V
Cheapest to own across 5 years
Family hauler
Mazda CX-50
Much stronger safety with more cargo room
Highway driver
Honda HR-V
Better adaptive cruise + lane keep
City driver
Honda HR-V
Easiest to park and maneuver in tight spots
03

Cost of Ownership

Monthly running costs — national baseline.
Adjust for your situation

State

Miles/yr15,000
Loan rate7%
Down payment20%
Honda HR-V
Monthly · 5-Year avg
$636
$38,157 total / 5 years
Total · monthly$636/mo
Mazda CX-50
Monthly · 5-Year avg
$711
$42,687 total / 5 years
Total · monthly$711/mo
💡
On fuel + maintenance alone, the pricier Mazda CX-50 would need 85.2 years to recoup its $3,400 price premium ($40/yr in savings) — longer than most people own a car. Depreciation and insurance aren’t included in this payback view.
04

Frequently asked questions

Honda HR-V comes out about $4,530 cheaper over 5 years on running costs (depreciation, fuel/energy, insurance, maintenance, financing). The gap shifts with your state, annual miles, and loan rate — use the "Adjust for your situation" panel above.

Where these rank

Browse all MotiveGrid rankings →

Helpful guides