Head-to-head · vehicle level

Kia Telluride vs. Mazda CX-50

Kia Telluride 80Mazda CX-50 86on the MotiveGrid ScoreMazda CX-50 about $15,190 less over 5 years
The verdict

The 2026 Mazda CX-50 is the cheaper one to own — roughly $15,190 less over five years, mostly because it holds its value better. The Kia Telluride counters with more power (291 vs 187 hp) and seating for 8.

Go with the Mazda CX-50 for the better long-term value; consider the Kia Telluride if you prioritize stronger acceleration and more passenger space.

Last updated May 2026 · National-average estimates

Kia Telluride vs. Mazda CX-50

MotiveGrid scores, key specs, and five-year cost comparison: 2027 Kia Telluride versus 2026 Mazda CX-50.
MetricKia TellurideMazda CX-50
MotiveGrid Score8086
Cost of Ownership7290
Powertrain6067
Driver Assistance3232
Livability6360
Safety10099
5-Year Cost to Own$57,877$42,687
Depreciation (5-yr)$20,771$11,631
Fuel / Energy (5-yr)$15,304$12,187
Insurance (5-yr)$10,760$9,535
Maintenance (5-yr)$1,915$1,790
Tires (5-yr)$2,150$2,150
Financing (5-yr)$5,896$4,499
Registration (5-yr)$1,080$895
Starting Price$39,190$29,900
Horsepower291 hp187 hp
MPG (combined)22 mpg27 mpg
Cargo volume21 cu ft31.4 cu ft
Seating85
Towing capacity2,000 lbs
DrivetrainFWDAWD
Gas
2027$39,190
2027 Kia Telluride in three-quarter front view
MSRP
$39,190
Mo · 5yr
$965
$57,877 / 5 years
Best on balance
Gas
2026$29,900
2026 Mazda CX-50 Turbo Premium Plus front three-quarter view
MSRP
$29,900
Mo · 5yr
$711
$42,687 / 5 years
Best for long-term savings
VS
01 · The MotiveGrid Score

Five measured pillars, weighted into one score.

Cost, Powertrain, Driver Assistance, Livability, and Safety — each scored against its class, then combined into a single MotiveGrid Score. Built by our engineering team and benchmarked against independent sources like NHTSA, IIHS, and CarEdge. How it’s calculated →

Mazda CX-50 scores higher overall.

Kia Telluride
0
/ 100
Mazda CX-50
0
/ 100
CostFive-year all-in cost to own, benchmarked against the class median.
Telluride
72
CX-50
90
Winner: CX-50
$15,190 cheaper / 5 yrs
Strong projected resale value
PowertrainEnergy efficiency paired with long-term ownership confidence.
Telluride
60
CX-50
67
Winner: CX-50
+7 pts
Driver AssistHighway driving support, parking convenience, and hands-free automation.
Telluride
32
CX-50
32
Evenly matched
LivabilityPassenger space, cargo room, and everyday maneuverability.
Telluride
63
CX-50
60
Winner: Telluride
+3 pts
SafetyCrash-test protection plus standard crash-avoidance features.
Telluride
100
CX-50
99
Winner: Telluride
+1 pts
02

Which vehicle is right for you

🏆

Mazda CX-50 is the better pick for long-term ownership — about $15,190 cheaper over 5 years with stronger fundamentals on running cost.

Kia Telluride still wins if your priority is best on balance.

Daily commuter
Mazda CX-50
Lowest energy cost per mile
Budget-focused
Mazda CX-50
Cheapest to own across 5 years
Family hauler
Mazda CX-50
Substantially more cargo room
Highway driver
Kia Telluride
Better adaptive cruise + lane keep
City driver
Mazda CX-50
Easiest to park and maneuver in tight spots
03

Cost of Ownership

Monthly running costs — national baseline.
Adjust for your situation

State

Miles/yr15,000
Loan rate7%
Down payment20%
Kia Telluride
Monthly · 5-Year avg
$965
$57,877 total / 5 years
Total · monthly$965/mo
Mazda CX-50
Monthly · 5-Year avg
$711
$42,687 total / 5 years
Total · monthly$711/mo
04

Frequently asked questions

Mazda CX-50 comes out about $15,190 cheaper over 5 years on running costs (depreciation, fuel/energy, insurance, maintenance, financing). The gap shifts with your state, annual miles, and loan rate — use the "Adjust for your situation" panel above.

Where these rank

Browse all MotiveGrid rankings →

Helpful guides